<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Thoughts on LoudLaunch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newinfluencer.com/a-few-thoughts-on-loudlaunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newinfluencer.com/a-few-thoughts-on-loudlaunch/</link>
	<description>A blog about social media, culture and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ether Breather</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfluencer.com/a-few-thoughts-on-loudlaunch/comment-page-1/#comment-2418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ether Breather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfluencer.com/?p=31#comment-2418</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that other professionals in this space share similar sentiments on this approach to social media.

Cecilia - I think you&#039;re analysis of LoudLaunch is on-point.  I also agree with Mark&#039;s point regarding the thematic nature of social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that other professionals in this space share similar sentiments on this approach to social media.</p>
<p>Cecilia &#8211; I think you&#8217;re analysis of LoudLaunch is on-point.  I also agree with Mark&#8217;s point regarding the thematic nature of social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfluencer.com/a-few-thoughts-on-loudlaunch/comment-page-1/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 06:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfluencer.com/?p=31#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>Social media and conversational marketing is about the conversation - people interested in actually communicating about a subject. It&#039;s not about links for pay. LoudLaunch sounds gross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social media and conversational marketing is about the conversation &#8211; people interested in actually communicating about a subject. It&#8217;s not about links for pay. LoudLaunch sounds gross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecelia Fresh</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfluencer.com/a-few-thoughts-on-loudlaunch/comment-page-1/#comment-2416</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecelia Fresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfluencer.com/?p=31#comment-2416</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with you! LoudLaunch.com has some re-configuring of their business approach ahead of them.
I perceive this as a form of &quot;schill marketing&quot; via blogging. It won&#039;t work.
What you&#039;ll end up with is a bunch of insincere blogging about your &quot;ad campaign&quot; and &quot;press release&quot;. I put these terms in quotes, because this guy Phil Greenwood, said pre-sales and marketing representative for LoudLaunch, doesn&#039;t have a clue what these aspects of communications really are and for that matter, he doesn&#039;t know how each of them operate.
It is very apparent that some guy came up with an &quot;idea&quot; of how to approach Web 2.0 communication from a marketing standpoint, without thoroughly resesarching the communications industry and truly knowing the aspects of what each communications vehicle is used for. This will end up as one of those random dot-coms that came and went. I&#039;m guessing he is part of the Web 1.0 aftermath that is just throwing out another bad idea to see if it sticks!
Nice try, but I say &quot;back to the drawing board&quot;.
I wouldn&#039;t pay a dime for such a service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you! LoudLaunch.com has some re-configuring of their business approach ahead of them.<br />
I perceive this as a form of &#8220;schill marketing&#8221; via blogging. It won&#8217;t work.<br />
What you&#8217;ll end up with is a bunch of insincere blogging about your &#8220;ad campaign&#8221; and &#8220;press release&#8221;. I put these terms in quotes, because this guy Phil Greenwood, said pre-sales and marketing representative for LoudLaunch, doesn&#8217;t have a clue what these aspects of communications really are and for that matter, he doesn&#8217;t know how each of them operate.<br />
It is very apparent that some guy came up with an &#8220;idea&#8221; of how to approach Web 2.0 communication from a marketing standpoint, without thoroughly resesarching the communications industry and truly knowing the aspects of what each communications vehicle is used for. This will end up as one of those random dot-coms that came and went. I&#8217;m guessing he is part of the Web 1.0 aftermath that is just throwing out another bad idea to see if it sticks!<br />
Nice try, but I say &#8220;back to the drawing board&#8221;.<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t pay a dime for such a service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

