<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newinfluencer.com/open-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newinfluencer.com/open-media/</link>
	<description>A blog about social media, culture and technology</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfluencer.com/open-media/#comment-2326</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfluencer.com/?p=12#comment-2326</guid>
		<description>i like cherry pies on jiyan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like cherry pies on jiyan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ether Breather</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfluencer.com/open-media/#comment-2325</link>
		<dc:creator>Ether Breather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 03:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfluencer.com/?p=12#comment-2325</guid>
		<description>New media is another commonly used term.  Actually, in the industry, it basically refers to 'cutting-edge media,' or 'media of the past couple years.'

It opens a whole new can of worms.  I believe the term initially popped up during the formative years of the Internet, and somewhat referred to media that was digital or electronic in nature.

I believe that when people are referring to 'social media,' they are attempting to communicate a departure from the early years of the Internet and trying to express something about the social aspects of the media, which isn't necessarily the case with 'new media.'

Another noted point with 'new media,' is the sense that it draws a line in the sand between itself and what has come in the past, which now becomes 'old media.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New media is another commonly used term.  Actually, in the industry, it basically refers to &#8216;cutting-edge media,&#8217; or &#8216;media of the past couple years.&#8217;</p>
<p>It opens a whole new can of worms.  I believe the term initially popped up during the formative years of the Internet, and somewhat referred to media that was digital or electronic in nature.</p>
<p>I believe that when people are referring to &#8217;social media,&#8217; they are attempting to communicate a departure from the early years of the Internet and trying to express something about the social aspects of the media, which isn&#8217;t necessarily the case with &#8216;new media.&#8217;</p>
<p>Another noted point with &#8216;new media,&#8217; is the sense that it draws a line in the sand between itself and what has come in the past, which now becomes &#8216;old media.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chico's Bail Bonds</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfluencer.com/open-media/#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>Chico's Bail Bonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfluencer.com/?p=12#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>I'm curious, though, how you feel about the term "new media" and whether it's helpful in connoting what I deem to be your goal... i.e., let's have a distinct break from broadcast / mass media and celebrate a return to news, ideas, accomplishments being disseminated at low levels of organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious, though, how you feel about the term &#8220;new media&#8221; and whether it&#8217;s helpful in connoting what I deem to be your goal&#8230; i.e., let&#8217;s have a distinct break from broadcast / mass media and celebrate a return to news, ideas, accomplishments being disseminated at low levels of organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
